After the end of World War II, the first international criminal courts were established by the Allies. At that time, there were no international regulations on the rights of the accused. However, effective steps were gradually taken in this direction, and numerous documents, both global and regional, addressed this issue in detail. Institutions such as the UN Human Rights Committee and the European Court of Human Rights were also envisaged to implement it. The openness of criminal proceedings is one of these rights. Subsequently, in the late twentieth century, other international courts were established. The question that can be raised in this regard is whether the international criminal law system is subject to the interpretations of human rights monitoring bodies regarding the rights of the accused, including the publicity of the proceedings. This article, using a descriptive analytical method, has reached this conclusion that Given the accused in the international criminal system faces more serious charges than the accused in the national system, and that human rights monitoring bodies have been interpreting the rights of the accused for many years, And the main and primary duty of international criminal courts is to implement the provisions of the humanitarian law system, therefore the provisions and procedures of the international criminal law system cannot be contrary to the human rights system.